https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87427 HC held that in the matter of GST registration cancellation, the sealing of the godown was a protective measure to safeguard stakeholders' interests, not based on inter-party disputes. The directive was implemented to prevent goods removal pending the Commissioner's decision on registration revocation application. The court emphasized a time-bound resolution process to ensure fair treatment and protect the rights of all parties, including financial institutions. The interim protective order was deemed appropriate to maintain status quo until a definitive determination could be made regarding the registration cancellation. en-us Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:36:08 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:36:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87427 HC held that in the matter of GST registration cancellation, the sealing of the godown was a protective measure to safeguard stakeholders' interests, not based on inter-party disputes. The directive was implemented to prevent goods removal pending the Commissioner's decision on registration revocation application. The court emphasized a time-bound resolution process to ensure fair treatment and protect the rights of all parties, including financial institutions. The interim protective order was deemed appropriate to maintain status quo until a definitive determination could be made regarding the registration cancellation. Highlights GST Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:36:08 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87427