https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42876 Section 6 of SAFEMA requires the competent authority to record reasons in writing that the property is illegally acquired and that the person falls within the Act; the notice need not reproduce those recorded reasons or underlying materials in detail. A notice is not invalid merely because it does not disclose the full basis of the belief, so long as the jurisdictional foundation exists in the recorded reasons. The notices here were also not considered too vague to be acted on at the threshold, because they indicated the statutory basis and left the recipients free to contest the proceedings in due course. The challenge failed and the statutory proceedings were allowed to continue. en-us Thu, 05 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:47:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42876 Section 6 of SAFEMA requires the competent authority to record reasons in writing that the property is illegally acquired and that the person falls within the Act; the notice need not reproduce those recorded reasons or underlying materials in detail. A notice is not invalid merely because it does not disclose the full basis of the belief, so long as the jurisdictional foundation exists in the recorded reasons. The notices here were also not considered too vague to be acted on at the threshold, because they indicated the statutory basis and left the recipients free to contest the proceedings in due course. The challenge failed and the statutory proceedings were allowed to continue. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 05 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42876