https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42875 The High Court upheld the Magistrate's order, dismissing the appeal and revision. Accused Nos. 2, 4, 6, and 7 were discharged due to the sanction not covering them. The court ruled that issues concerning the validity of the sanction and other contentions should be addressed later in the trial. The complainant and accused Nos. 1 and 5 were directed to appear before the Magistrate for further proceedings. en-us Fri, 09 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:45:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42875 The High Court upheld the Magistrate's order, dismissing the appeal and revision. Accused Nos. 2, 4, 6, and 7 were discharged due to the sanction not covering them. The court ruled that issues concerning the validity of the sanction and other contentions should be addressed later in the trial. The complainant and accused Nos. 1 and 5 were directed to appear before the Magistrate for further proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 09 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42875