https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768769 Revisional interference in a cheque dishonour conviction is confined to illegality, impropriety, perversity, or manifest misreading of evidence. Where the cheque and signature are admitted and the complainant proves the transaction and legally enforceable debt through oral and documentary evidence, the statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act operate and must be rebutted on a preponderance of probabilities; a bare denial of liability is insufficient. On those facts, the conviction was not disturbed, but the substantive custodial sentence was reduced to imprisonment till the rising of the court, while compensation and the default sentence were maintained. en-us Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:36:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768769 Revisional interference in a cheque dishonour conviction is confined to illegality, impropriety, perversity, or manifest misreading of evidence. Where the cheque and signature are admitted and the complainant proves the transaction and legally enforceable debt through oral and documentary evidence, the statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act operate and must be rebutted on a preponderance of probabilities; a bare denial of liability is insufficient. On those facts, the conviction was not disturbed, but the substantive custodial sentence was reduced to imprisonment till the rising of the court, while compensation and the default sentence were maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768769