https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768769 The Kerala HC partially allowed a revision petition in a dishonour of cheque case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld the conviction and compensation order while modifying the sentence. The HC ruled that the complainant successfully proved the existence of a legally enforceable debt and that the accused's defenses were insufficient to rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139. The court emphasized that revisional jurisdiction should only interfere with lower court orders when they suffer from incorrectness, illegality, or impropriety, and found no such defects in the trial and appellate court decisions. en-us Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:36:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768769 The Kerala HC partially allowed a revision petition in a dishonour of cheque case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld the conviction and compensation order while modifying the sentence. The HC ruled that the complainant successfully proved the existence of a legally enforceable debt and that the accused's defenses were insufficient to rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139. The court emphasized that revisional jurisdiction should only interfere with lower court orders when they suffer from incorrectness, illegality, or impropriety, and found no such defects in the trial and appellate court decisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768769