<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 687 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768773</link>
    <description>The HP HC dismissed the appeal challenging VAT levy at 13.75% instead of claimed 5% rate. The court held that petitioner&#039;s manufactured goods (mechanical bodies, pre-fab shelters, sheet metal parts) did not qualify as capital goods under Schedule A Part-II-A, thus correctly taxable at 13.75% under Part-III residuary entry. The petitioner had described goods as &quot;sheet metal parts&quot; in VAT-XXVI-A forms while claiming specialized capital goods status, constituting concealment and false information. The court upheld additional VAT demand of 8.75% differential for 2012-13 and 2013-14, along with penalty, finding authorities correctly interpreted statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 687 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768773</link>
      <description>The HP HC dismissed the appeal challenging VAT levy at 13.75% instead of claimed 5% rate. The court held that petitioner&#039;s manufactured goods (mechanical bodies, pre-fab shelters, sheet metal parts) did not qualify as capital goods under Schedule A Part-II-A, thus correctly taxable at 13.75% under Part-III residuary entry. The petitioner had described goods as &quot;sheet metal parts&quot; in VAT-XXVI-A forms while claiming specialized capital goods status, constituting concealment and false information. The court upheld additional VAT demand of 8.75% differential for 2012-13 and 2013-14, along with penalty, finding authorities correctly interpreted statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>