<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 689 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768775</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that packing and labeling tyre &#039;O&#039; rings does not constitute &#039;manufacture&#039; under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The &#039;O&#039; rings were classified under Chapter 4016, not Chapter 87, as they have broader applicability beyond automobiles. The Tribunal found no distinct product emerged from packaging, thus exempting the appellants from central excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 689 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768775</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that packing and labeling tyre &#039;O&#039; rings does not constitute &#039;manufacture&#039; under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The &#039;O&#039; rings were classified under Chapter 4016, not Chapter 87, as they have broader applicability beyond automobiles. The Tribunal found no distinct product emerged from packaging, thus exempting the appellants from central excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>