<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 693 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768779</link>
    <description>A prima facie scheduled offence can support money-laundering proceedings where the record shows dishonest inducement, wrongful gain to one party, wrongful loss to another, and concerted conduct in furtherance of the alleged scheme. The Tribunal examined allegations that work orders and a call-monitoring arrangement were used to intercept employees&#039; calls without lawful authority, and treated the decisive factor as the specific allegation of cheating and criminal conspiracy rather than a general privacy complaint or the bail order relied on by the appellant. On that basis, the predicate offence was found prima facie made out, and the provisional attachment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:36:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 693 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768779</link>
      <description>A prima facie scheduled offence can support money-laundering proceedings where the record shows dishonest inducement, wrongful gain to one party, wrongful loss to another, and concerted conduct in furtherance of the alleged scheme. The Tribunal examined allegations that work orders and a call-monitoring arrangement were used to intercept employees&#039; calls without lawful authority, and treated the decisive factor as the specific allegation of cheating and criminal conspiracy rather than a general privacy complaint or the bail order relied on by the appellant. On that basis, the predicate offence was found prima facie made out, and the provisional attachment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>