https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768781 The SC set aside orders by the HC and Appellate Tribunal regarding property attachment under Section 8(3) of PMLA. The Court held that when determining the duration of attachment orders, it is sufficient if a complaint alleging offence under Section 3 of PMLA is pending before the Special Court, regardless of whether the affected person is specifically named as accused in the complaint. The original provision of Section 8(3)(a) PMLA, existing before the 2018 amendment, applied to the case. The attachment order continues to operate as long as proceedings relating to PMLA offence remain pending in court. Appeal allowed. en-us Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:36:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768781 The SC set aside orders by the HC and Appellate Tribunal regarding property attachment under Section 8(3) of PMLA. The Court held that when determining the duration of attachment orders, it is sufficient if a complaint alleging offence under Section 3 of PMLA is pending before the Special Court, regardless of whether the affected person is specifically named as accused in the complaint. The original provision of Section 8(3)(a) PMLA, existing before the 2018 amendment, applied to the case. The attachment order continues to operate as long as proceedings relating to PMLA offence remain pending in court. Appeal allowed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768781