<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 699 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768785</link>
    <description>SC upheld constitutional validity of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provisions, specifically Regulation 23A and Section 140. Court found no violation of Articles 14, 19, or 21. Special leave petitions were disposed of without specific comments on the petitioner&#039;s personal case. Respondents&#039; arguments were accepted, and the HC&#039;s original decision was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 699 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768785</link>
      <description>SC upheld constitutional validity of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provisions, specifically Regulation 23A and Section 140. Court found no violation of Articles 14, 19, or 21. Special leave petitions were disposed of without specific comments on the petitioner&#039;s personal case. Respondents&#039; arguments were accepted, and the HC&#039;s original decision was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>