https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768786 NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging procedural order dated 08.01.2025 in Company Petition. Appellant sought impleadment claiming right to receive shares in respondent company, arguing violation of natural justice as impleadment application was not heard separately. NCLAT held the Company Petition between respondents regarding oppression and mismanagement was not a dispute between two brothers. The impugned order was merely procedural, recording filing of submission notes, and did not dilute appellant's rights. Procedural orders are not appealable per SC precedent. Appellant failed to challenge main order dated 18.12.2024 concluding arguments but complied by filing submissions, thus losing right to challenge consequential procedural order. en-us Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:36:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768786 NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging procedural order dated 08.01.2025 in Company Petition. Appellant sought impleadment claiming right to receive shares in respondent company, arguing violation of natural justice as impleadment application was not heard separately. NCLAT held the Company Petition between respondents regarding oppression and mismanagement was not a dispute between two brothers. The impugned order was merely procedural, recording filing of submission notes, and did not dilute appellant's rights. Procedural orders are not appealable per SC precedent. Appellant failed to challenge main order dated 18.12.2024 concluding arguments but complied by filing submissions, thus losing right to challenge consequential procedural order. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768786