<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 708 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768794</link>
    <description>The HC addressed jurisdictional challenges to DRI officers&#039; authority under Section 28 of the Customs Act. Relying on SC precedent in Canon-II, the court confirmed DRI officers as proper officers for issuing show cause notices. The HC directed petitioners to pursue appellate remedies with the Commissioner (Appeals), allowing cross-examination requests to be considered, and providing a timeline for filing appeals by June 30, 2025.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:51:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 708 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768794</link>
      <description>The HC addressed jurisdictional challenges to DRI officers&#039; authority under Section 28 of the Customs Act. Relying on SC precedent in Canon-II, the court confirmed DRI officers as proper officers for issuing show cause notices. The HC directed petitioners to pursue appellate remedies with the Commissioner (Appeals), allowing cross-examination requests to be considered, and providing a timeline for filing appeals by June 30, 2025.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>