<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 709 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768795</link>
    <description>DRI issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) challenged on jurisdictional grounds. SC in Canon-II clarified DRI officials are proper officers under Section 28 of Customs Act. HC upheld SCN validity, directing proceedings to continue. Limitation issue was left for Adjudicating Authority to decide, allowing petitioner to present arguments. Proceedings deemed valid and authorized to move forward.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:36:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 709 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768795</link>
      <description>DRI issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) challenged on jurisdictional grounds. SC in Canon-II clarified DRI officials are proper officers under Section 28 of Customs Act. HC upheld SCN validity, directing proceedings to continue. Limitation issue was left for Adjudicating Authority to decide, allowing petitioner to present arguments. Proceedings deemed valid and authorized to move forward.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>