<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 718 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768804</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Tribunal partially ruled in favor of the assessee. It deleted the Rs.5,50,000/- unaccounted income addition and reduced the income estimation from 8% to 5% of total turnover. The Tribunal emphasized that lack of specific documentation does not automatically render cash deposits unexplained if overall financial records support the declared turnover. The interest charge under Section 234A remained largely unaddressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:17:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 718 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768804</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Tribunal partially ruled in favor of the assessee. It deleted the Rs.5,50,000/- unaccounted income addition and reduced the income estimation from 8% to 5% of total turnover. The Tribunal emphasized that lack of specific documentation does not automatically render cash deposits unexplained if overall financial records support the declared turnover. The interest charge under Section 234A remained largely unaddressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>