https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42863 Where an appeal against a demand and a stay application are already pending, insistence on pre-deposit as a condition for hearing the appeal may be inappropriate if coercive recovery would prejudice the appellant. The Court found substantial grounds for stay and held that the appellate authority should hear the appeal on its merits without requiring deposit of the disputed amount. The demand to deposit the amount was set aside, and the pending appeal was directed to be heard expeditiously without pre-deposit. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:16:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42863 Where an appeal against a demand and a stay application are already pending, insistence on pre-deposit as a condition for hearing the appeal may be inappropriate if coercive recovery would prejudice the appellant. The Court found substantial grounds for stay and held that the appellate authority should hear the appeal on its merits without requiring deposit of the disputed amount. The demand to deposit the amount was set aside, and the pending appeal was directed to be heard expeditiously without pre-deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42863