<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1746 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461549</link>
    <description>SC allowed an amendment to include a third party (Pawan Kumar) in a civil suit after trial commencement. Despite procedural restrictions, the court prioritized substantive justice, finding Pawan Kumar a necessary party due to his possession of the suit property. The court set aside lower court orders, directing the trial court to proceed on merits while imposing costs on the plaintiff.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 14:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1746 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461549</link>
      <description>SC allowed an amendment to include a third party (Pawan Kumar) in a civil suit after trial commencement. Despite procedural restrictions, the court prioritized substantive justice, finding Pawan Kumar a necessary party due to his possession of the suit property. The court set aside lower court orders, directing the trial court to proceed on merits while imposing costs on the plaintiff.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>