<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1565 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461553</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging two procedural orders, finding that the Appellant had already been afforded opportunities to submit arguments and replies. The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to reserve the order was procedurally sound, and no further rehearing was warranted. The appeal was consequently rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 14:41:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1565 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461553</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging two procedural orders, finding that the Appellant had already been afforded opportunities to submit arguments and replies. The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to reserve the order was procedurally sound, and no further rehearing was warranted. The appeal was consequently rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>