<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 679 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768765</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax registration cancellation. Court directed petitioner to file revocation application within two weeks and instructed tax authorities to decide the application on merits within three weeks, ensuring fair hearing. Petition disposed of without costs, emphasizing statutory remedy under Section 30 of GST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 679 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768765</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax registration cancellation. Court directed petitioner to file revocation application within two weeks and instructed tax authorities to decide the application on merits within three weeks, ensuring fair hearing. Petition disposed of without costs, emphasizing statutory remedy under Section 30 of GST Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>