<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 677 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768763</link>
    <description>HC found procedural violations in GST assessment order. Respondent failed to consider petitioner&#039;s reply and denied personal hearing, violating Section 75(4) of GST Act and natural justice principles. Court set aside the impugned order, remanded the matter for fresh consideration, and ordered lifting of bank account attachment, ensuring due process and fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 14:41:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 677 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768763</link>
      <description>HC found procedural violations in GST assessment order. Respondent failed to consider petitioner&#039;s reply and denied personal hearing, violating Section 75(4) of GST Act and natural justice principles. Court set aside the impugned order, remanded the matter for fresh consideration, and ordered lifting of bank account attachment, ensuring due process and fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>