<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 675 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768761</link>
    <description>Multiple overlapping show cause notices covering different periods were challenged, with the absence of clarification on whether they would be bifurcated or consolidated. Final assessment orders had meanwhile been passed, but an earlier direction indicated that any such orders would remain subject to the writ petition. The court therefore kept the matter pending for replies and rejoinder and granted interim protection by restraining coercive action pursuant to the specified assessment orders until further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 675 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768761</link>
      <description>Multiple overlapping show cause notices covering different periods were challenged, with the absence of clarification on whether they would be bifurcated or consolidated. Final assessment orders had meanwhile been passed, but an earlier direction indicated that any such orders would remain subject to the writ petition. The court therefore kept the matter pending for replies and rejoinder and granted interim protection by restraining coercive action pursuant to the specified assessment orders until further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>