<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 665 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal examined penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act and found them unjustified. The court deleted penalties totaling Rs. 5,51,606/- based on Supreme Court precedent, ruling that mere disallowance of expenses does not constitute concealment. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties require clear evidence of deliberate tax misconduct, not just accounting adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 14:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 665 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal examined penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act and found them unjustified. The court deleted penalties totaling Rs. 5,51,606/- based on Supreme Court precedent, ruling that mere disallowance of expenses does not constitute concealment. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties require clear evidence of deliberate tax misconduct, not just accounting adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>