<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 660 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768746</link>
    <description>NCLT case addressing administrative power of Tribunal President to transfer cases between Benches. SC held that President has discretionary power to transfer cases under Rule 16(d) without mandatorily providing reasons. Transfer does not prejudicially affect parties&#039; rights. Appeal dismissed, affirming administrative flexibility in case management without requiring detailed justification for inter-Bench transfers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 14:37:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 660 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768746</link>
      <description>NCLT case addressing administrative power of Tribunal President to transfer cases between Benches. SC held that President has discretionary power to transfer cases under Rule 16(d) without mandatorily providing reasons. Transfer does not prejudicially affect parties&#039; rights. Appeal dismissed, affirming administrative flexibility in case management without requiring detailed justification for inter-Bench transfers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>