https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461547 Refusal of bail under Section 439 CrPC was found to disclose no legal infirmity, as the reasons recorded by the Special Judge and the High Court were held sufficient to justify denial of bail. The challenge to the rejection of the bail prayer therefore did not warrant interference, and the refusal was upheld. The Court, however, permitted the petitioners to file fresh bail applications after framing of charges, and petitioner no. 2 was allowed to invoke Section 437 CrPC again in such subsequent application. en-us Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:27:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461547 Refusal of bail under Section 439 CrPC was found to disclose no legal infirmity, as the reasons recorded by the Special Judge and the High Court were held sufficient to justify denial of bail. The challenge to the rejection of the bail prayer therefore did not warrant interference, and the refusal was upheld. The Court, however, permitted the petitioners to file fresh bail applications after framing of charges, and petitioner no. 2 was allowed to invoke Section 437 CrPC again in such subsequent application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461547