<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 652 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768738</link>
    <description>The ITAT remanded a case involving tax exemption registration under section 12A and section 80G approval. The Tribunal found procedural deficiencies in the initial application and directed the CIT(Exemption) to provide a final opportunity for the assessee to substantiate its case by submitting requisite details. The section 80G approval was contingent on resolving the section 12A registration issue, with the appeal allowed for statistical purposes to ensure procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 08:40:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 652 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768738</link>
      <description>The ITAT remanded a case involving tax exemption registration under section 12A and section 80G approval. The Tribunal found procedural deficiencies in the initial application and directed the CIT(Exemption) to provide a final opportunity for the assessee to substantiate its case by submitting requisite details. The section 80G approval was contingent on resolving the section 12A registration issue, with the appeal allowed for statistical purposes to ensure procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>