<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1448 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461543</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Mumbai-AT allowed the appeal regarding classification of services provided by a clearing and forwarding agent. The tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s services did not qualify as &quot;clearing and forwarding agent services&quot; as they involved handling export/import cargo for a vessel owner/NVOCC with clients outside India, lacking the typical C&amp;amp;F agent characteristics of receiving goods from manufacturers and acting as their agent. The services were properly classified under Business Auxiliary Services (BAS) and Business Support Services (BSS), for which service tax of Rs.3,45,06,438 had already been paid. The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII lacked jurisdiction over branches outside Mumbai, and the extended period of limitation was improperly invoked without evidence of fraud or suppression. Penalties were also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 08:39:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1448 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461543</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Mumbai-AT allowed the appeal regarding classification of services provided by a clearing and forwarding agent. The tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s services did not qualify as &quot;clearing and forwarding agent services&quot; as they involved handling export/import cargo for a vessel owner/NVOCC with clients outside India, lacking the typical C&amp;amp;F agent characteristics of receiving goods from manufacturers and acting as their agent. The services were properly classified under Business Auxiliary Services (BAS) and Business Support Services (BSS), for which service tax of Rs.3,45,06,438 had already been paid. The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII lacked jurisdiction over branches outside Mumbai, and the extended period of limitation was improperly invoked without evidence of fraud or suppression. Penalties were also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>