<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 644 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768730</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee regarding an addition treated as income from other sources under section 56(2)(viib). The tribunal found the issue was covered by the precedent in Sakshi Fincap case and noted that the difference was 0.88%, which fell below the 10% threshold specified in the relevant notification. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the grounds raised by the assessee and deleted the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 08:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 644 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768730</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee regarding an addition treated as income from other sources under section 56(2)(viib). The tribunal found the issue was covered by the precedent in Sakshi Fincap case and noted that the difference was 0.88%, which fell below the 10% threshold specified in the relevant notification. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the grounds raised by the assessee and deleted the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>