<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 647 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768733</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance of interest expenses under section 57(iii) was unsustainable. The assessee had borrowed funds exceeding amounts lent and voluntarily disallowed proportionate interest expenses in income computation. Since borrowed funds were directly invested in company with interest payments properly adjusted against corresponding loans, following coordinate bench precedent from AY 2020-21, the addition made by AO was deleted. Appeal decided in favor of assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 08:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 647 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768733</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance of interest expenses under section 57(iii) was unsustainable. The assessee had borrowed funds exceeding amounts lent and voluntarily disallowed proportionate interest expenses in income computation. Since borrowed funds were directly invested in company with interest payments properly adjusted against corresponding loans, following coordinate bench precedent from AY 2020-21, the addition made by AO was deleted. Appeal decided in favor of assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>