<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 122 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42841</link>
    <description>Printed books older than one hundred years are not automatically excluded from Heading 49.01; classification may instead fall under Heading 97.06 as antiques depending on the specific book&#039;s age, character, trade treatment, price, and whether it is valued as a book or for antique value. In the absence of actual import and evidence relating to any identified book, the classification dispute was treated as abstract and academic and not suitable for adjudication in writ proceedings. The customs authorities were held to be the proper forum to determine the issue first when concrete facts arise, so the challenge was dismissed as premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:10:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 122 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42841</link>
      <description>Printed books older than one hundred years are not automatically excluded from Heading 49.01; classification may instead fall under Heading 97.06 as antiques depending on the specific book&#039;s age, character, trade treatment, price, and whether it is valued as a book or for antique value. In the absence of actual import and evidence relating to any identified book, the classification dispute was treated as abstract and academic and not suitable for adjudication in writ proceedings. The customs authorities were held to be the proper forum to determine the issue first when concrete facts arise, so the challenge was dismissed as premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>