<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1545 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461531</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal ruled that the surcharge levied by the tax authority was unwarranted. Since the assessee&#039;s total income (Rs. 16,24,880) did not exceed the Rs. 50 lakh threshold under the Finance Act, 2021, the surcharge of Rs. 1,73,278 was deleted. The decision affirmed the statutory income tax threshold for surcharge applicability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 18:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1545 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461531</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal ruled that the surcharge levied by the tax authority was unwarranted. Since the assessee&#039;s total income (Rs. 16,24,880) did not exceed the Rs. 50 lakh threshold under the Finance Act, 2021, the surcharge of Rs. 1,73,278 was deleted. The decision affirmed the statutory income tax threshold for surcharge applicability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>