<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1621 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461534</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal examined the levy of a 37% surcharge on income tax when the assessee&#039;s income was below Rs. 50 lakhs. Based on the Finance Act, 2021, the Tribunal concluded that surcharge is not applicable for incomes under the specified threshold. The appeal was allowed, and the surcharge was deleted, establishing a clear interpretation of tax surcharge provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 18:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1621 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461534</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal examined the levy of a 37% surcharge on income tax when the assessee&#039;s income was below Rs. 50 lakhs. Based on the Finance Act, 2021, the Tribunal concluded that surcharge is not applicable for incomes under the specified threshold. The appeal was allowed, and the surcharge was deleted, establishing a clear interpretation of tax surcharge provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>