<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1408 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461522</link>
    <description>The SC/ITAT examined an indexation dispute regarding property acquisition and redevelopment. The Tribunal found insufficient clarity on investment timelines and remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for reassessment. The decision emphasized applying precedent principles of indexation from property rights acquisition date, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes pending further investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:13:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1408 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461522</link>
      <description>The SC/ITAT examined an indexation dispute regarding property acquisition and redevelopment. The Tribunal found insufficient clarity on investment timelines and remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for reassessment. The decision emphasized applying precedent principles of indexation from property rights acquisition date, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes pending further investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>