<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Writ Petition Dismissed: Show Cause Notice Upheld Due to Petitioner&#039;s Non-Appearance and Availability of Alternative Remedy</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87366</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a show cause notice, finding no violation of natural justice principles. The court determined that the petitioner failed to appear on the scheduled hearing date despite prior opportunities, and had an alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 107. The order was deemed valid as the competent authority reviewed submitted documents and responses. The petitioner&#039;s claim of procedural impropriety was rejected due to non-appearance and lack of substantive evidence supporting the allegation of prejudice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:40:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:40:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Writ Petition Dismissed: Show Cause Notice Upheld Due to Petitioner&#039;s Non-Appearance and Availability of Alternative Remedy</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87366</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a show cause notice, finding no violation of natural justice principles. The court determined that the petitioner failed to appear on the scheduled hearing date despite prior opportunities, and had an alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 107. The order was deemed valid as the competent authority reviewed submitted documents and responses. The petitioner&#039;s claim of procedural impropriety was rejected due to non-appearance and lack of substantive evidence supporting the allegation of prejudice.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:40:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>