<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 116 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42825</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the petitioners, emphasizing the importance of granting them a fair hearing before disposing of stay applications. It was held that the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) erred in not following the principles of natural justice. The orders dismissing the stay applications and the appeal were set aside, and the case was remitted back to the Collector for reconsideration with proper hearing of the petitioners&#039; submissions. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:40:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 116 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42825</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the petitioners, emphasizing the importance of granting them a fair hearing before disposing of stay applications. It was held that the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) erred in not following the principles of natural justice. The orders dismissing the stay applications and the appeal were set aside, and the case was remitted back to the Collector for reconsideration with proper hearing of the petitioners&#039; submissions. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>