<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 563 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768649</link>
    <description>The SC found the Commercial Tax Tribunal&#039;s assessment invalid. The tribunal improperly rejected account books and relied on unreliable eye estimation methods without actual weighment. The court quashed the assessment order, ruling that stock calculations must be based on credible evidence, not mere visual estimates. The decision favored the assessee and established stricter standards for tax assessment methodologies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:40:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 563 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768649</link>
      <description>The SC found the Commercial Tax Tribunal&#039;s assessment invalid. The tribunal improperly rejected account books and relied on unreliable eye estimation methods without actual weighment. The court quashed the assessment order, ruling that stock calculations must be based on credible evidence, not mere visual estimates. The decision favored the assessee and established stricter standards for tax assessment methodologies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>