<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 566 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768652</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on refinery-related input services was allowed where the services had a direct or indirect nexus with manufacture or fell within the inclusive limb of Rule 2(l), including employee medical insurance required by statute, CISF-related security insurance, garden maintenance for compliance, document search and underwater diving. Credit was denied for outdoor catering and other services found to be unconnected with manufacturing operations or otherwise excluded. Penalty and interest were not sustained on credit voluntarily reversed before the show cause notice, because the record showed sufficient credit balance and no actual utilisation of the disputed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:39:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 566 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768652</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on refinery-related input services was allowed where the services had a direct or indirect nexus with manufacture or fell within the inclusive limb of Rule 2(l), including employee medical insurance required by statute, CISF-related security insurance, garden maintenance for compliance, document search and underwater diving. Credit was denied for outdoor catering and other services found to be unconnected with manufacturing operations or otherwise excluded. Penalty and interest were not sustained on credit voluntarily reversed before the show cause notice, because the record showed sufficient credit balance and no actual utilisation of the disputed amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>