<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 566 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768652</link>
    <description>CESTAT Mumbai ruled on CENVAT credit eligibility for various input services. The tribunal allowed credit of Rs. 50,40,522 for medical/health insurance for employees and CISF security staff, garden maintenance services, underwater diving services, and document search services, finding these integral to manufacturing operations. Credit was denied for Rs. 9,03,065 covering outdoor catering, road maintenance, bus services, and other miscellaneous services lacking direct connection to manufacturing. The appellant had already reversed ineligible credits for family medical insurance. No penalty or interest was imposed given the mixed nature of the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:40:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 566 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768652</link>
      <description>CESTAT Mumbai ruled on CENVAT credit eligibility for various input services. The tribunal allowed credit of Rs. 50,40,522 for medical/health insurance for employees and CISF security staff, garden maintenance services, underwater diving services, and document search services, finding these integral to manufacturing operations. Credit was denied for Rs. 9,03,065 covering outdoor catering, road maintenance, bus services, and other miscellaneous services lacking direct connection to manufacturing. The appellant had already reversed ineligible credits for family medical insurance. No penalty or interest was imposed given the mixed nature of the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>