https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768654 CESTAT Hyderabad remanded the appeal to the Adjudicating Authority for re-examination of CENVAT credit claims. The appellant was denied credit for lacking proper documents under Rule 9(1) of CCR, taking credit on ineligible services, and issues with reverse charge mechanism payments to Indian Port Association. The Tribunal directed the Authority to verify if documents meet Rule 9(2) criteria, determine eligibility of input services for output services, examine RCM applicability, and consider previous order regarding non-invocation of extended period for government organizations. Appeal allowed by way of remand. en-us Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:40:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768654 CESTAT Hyderabad remanded the appeal to the Adjudicating Authority for re-examination of CENVAT credit claims. The appellant was denied credit for lacking proper documents under Rule 9(1) of CCR, taking credit on ineligible services, and issues with reverse charge mechanism payments to Indian Port Association. The Tribunal directed the Authority to verify if documents meet Rule 9(2) criteria, determine eligibility of input services for output services, examine RCM applicability, and consider previous order regarding non-invocation of extended period for government organizations. Appeal allowed by way of remand. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768654