https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768659 Bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was refused because the material disclosed a prima facie role in facilitating the alleged laundering activity, and the applicant did not satisfy the twin conditions under Section 45 requiring reasonable grounds to believe he was not guilty and not likely to commit an offence on bail. The Court also rejected the objection that prosecution of a public servant required prior sanction, holding that the alleged conduct was not shown to be part of official duty and appeared to relate to participation in the crime itself. On that basis, the bail plea failed on merits. en-us Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:39:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768659 Bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was refused because the material disclosed a prima facie role in facilitating the alleged laundering activity, and the applicant did not satisfy the twin conditions under Section 45 requiring reasonable grounds to believe he was not guilty and not likely to commit an offence on bail. The Court also rejected the objection that prosecution of a public servant required prior sanction, holding that the alleged conduct was not shown to be part of official duty and appeared to relate to participation in the crime itself. On that basis, the bail plea failed on merits. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768659