https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768660 The dispute concerned whether import benefits under the relevant export incentive schemes could be availed in the sequence claimed and whether the policy and DGFT public notice governing simultaneous availment had been properly applied. The record showed that the original authority had not fully considered the timing of the imports, the appellant's explanation, and the effect of the public notice. The CESTAT therefore set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication so the sequence of events and the policy prescription could be examined in context. The matter was not finally decided on merits. en-us Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768660 The dispute concerned whether import benefits under the relevant export incentive schemes could be availed in the sequence claimed and whether the policy and DGFT public notice governing simultaneous availment had been properly applied. The record showed that the original authority had not fully considered the timing of the imports, the appellant's explanation, and the effect of the public notice. The CESTAT therefore set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication so the sequence of events and the policy prescription could be examined in context. The matter was not finally decided on merits. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768660