<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 574 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768660</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal examined a complex trade policy dispute involving simultaneous benefits under SHIS and Zero Duty EPCG schemes. The court set aside the original order and remanded the case for fresh adjudication, finding the initial assessment incomplete. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a comprehensive review of the appellant&#039;s actions, policy compliance, and intent, without conclusively determining final liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:40:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 574 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768660</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal examined a complex trade policy dispute involving simultaneous benefits under SHIS and Zero Duty EPCG schemes. The court set aside the original order and remanded the case for fresh adjudication, finding the initial assessment incomplete. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a comprehensive review of the appellant&#039;s actions, policy compliance, and intent, without conclusively determining final liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>