<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 600 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768686</link>
    <description>INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL CASE SUMMARYThe Tribunal addressed penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of Income-tax Act. After reviewing the assessment orders, the Tribunal found no incriminating material and quashed the penalties. Following precedent from SC in K.C. Builders case, the Tribunal ruled that penalties cannot survive when underlying assessment orders are invalidated. Appeals by assessees were allowed, and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:40:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 600 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768686</link>
      <description>INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL CASE SUMMARYThe Tribunal addressed penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of Income-tax Act. After reviewing the assessment orders, the Tribunal found no incriminating material and quashed the penalties. Following precedent from SC in K.C. Builders case, the Tribunal ruled that penalties cannot survive when underlying assessment orders are invalidated. Appeals by assessees were allowed, and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>