<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 617 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768703</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging the HC&#039;s decision adding cash transactions under Section 40A(3). The assessee failed to prove representation of a syndicate or collection of cash from syndicate members for payment. The Tribunal rightly held that no exceptional circumstances justified cash payment exempting Section 40A(3). The Court found no reason to interfere with the HC&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 617 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768703</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging the HC&#039;s decision adding cash transactions under Section 40A(3). The assessee failed to prove representation of a syndicate or collection of cash from syndicate members for payment. The Tribunal rightly held that no exceptional circumstances justified cash payment exempting Section 40A(3). The Court found no reason to interfere with the HC&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>