https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768705 An adjudication order under the GST law must be self-contained and record the relevant facts and basis of decision as required by Section 75(6). A final order that merely refers to prior notices and notes the absence of a reply, without setting out the factual basis or reasoning, is unsustainable. The HC quashed the assessment order for non-compliance with Section 75(6) and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to give the taxpayer an opportunity to respond and then pass a fresh order after hearing. en-us Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768705 An adjudication order under the GST law must be self-contained and record the relevant facts and basis of decision as required by Section 75(6). A final order that merely refers to prior notices and notes the absence of a reply, without setting out the factual basis or reasoning, is unsustainable. The HC quashed the assessment order for non-compliance with Section 75(6) and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to give the taxpayer an opportunity to respond and then pass a fresh order after hearing. Case-Laws GST Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768705