<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 621 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768707</link>
    <description>The HC examined a tax order under the UP GST Act, focusing on whether natural justice principles were violated by not providing a personal hearing. After finding the petitioner was given an opportunity to appear on 28.08.2024 but did not utilize it, the HC dismissed the petition. The court held that failing to appear negates claims of procedural impropriety, and alternative appeal mechanisms remained available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:40:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 621 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768707</link>
      <description>The HC examined a tax order under the UP GST Act, focusing on whether natural justice principles were violated by not providing a personal hearing. After finding the petitioner was given an opportunity to appear on 28.08.2024 but did not utilize it, the HC dismissed the petition. The court held that failing to appear negates claims of procedural impropriety, and alternative appeal mechanisms remained available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>