<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Opposition claims Sec 44(3) of DPDP Act destroys RTI, seeks repeal</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=40508</link>
    <description>Section 44(3) of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act is said to substitute the RTI Act&#039;s limitation on personal-information disclosure by removing the prior public-interest safeguard. Whereas Section 8(1)(j) allowed withholding personal information unless disclosure served a larger public interest as determined by information officers or appellate authorities, the DPDP provision is criticised for barring disclosure of information &quot;which relates to personal information&quot; without retaining any public-interest exception, thereby inhibiting access to information on public concerns such as contracts or infrastructure safety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:31:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Opposition claims Sec 44(3) of DPDP Act destroys RTI, seeks repeal</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=40508</link>
      <description>Section 44(3) of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act is said to substitute the RTI Act&#039;s limitation on personal-information disclosure by removing the prior public-interest safeguard. Whereas Section 8(1)(j) allowed withholding personal information unless disclosure served a larger public interest as determined by information officers or appellate authorities, the DPDP provision is criticised for barring disclosure of information &quot;which relates to personal information&quot; without retaining any public-interest exception, thereby inhibiting access to information on public concerns such as contracts or infrastructure safety.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:31:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=40508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>