<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42809</link>
    <description>A retracted statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act may still be relied on if it is found voluntary and truthful, especially where supported by general corroboration; the court treated the statement as admissible on that basis. The absence of Form No. 37 for baggage declaration was held not to be mandatory and did not by itself invalidate the search, seizure, or prosecution where the passenger had been asked to declare the contents and denied carrying anything dutiable. On correcting those errors, the evidence established non-declaration of restricted goods, so the acquittal was set aside and the conviction and sentence were restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42809</link>
      <description>A retracted statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act may still be relied on if it is found voluntary and truthful, especially where supported by general corroboration; the court treated the statement as admissible on that basis. The absence of Form No. 37 for baggage declaration was held not to be mandatory and did not by itself invalidate the search, seizure, or prosecution where the passenger had been asked to declare the contents and denied carrying anything dutiable. On correcting those errors, the evidence established non-declaration of restricted goods, so the acquittal was set aside and the conviction and sentence were restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>