https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42807 A Tribunal refund order based on redetermined assessable value and differential duty on certain sales was treated as binding, and the Assistant Collector's refusal to implement it was viewed as without jurisdiction. The court held that the proper course against the Tribunal's order was to challenge it before the Supreme Court, not to disregard it administratively. Interim writ relief was granted, directing compliance with the refund directions within two months and staying operation of the subsequent departmental order dated 09-03-1990. en-us Fri, 06 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:38:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42807 A Tribunal refund order based on redetermined assessable value and differential duty on certain sales was treated as binding, and the Assistant Collector's refusal to implement it was viewed as without jurisdiction. The court held that the proper course against the Tribunal's order was to challenge it before the Supreme Court, not to disregard it administratively. Interim writ relief was granted, directing compliance with the refund directions within two months and staying operation of the subsequent departmental order dated 09-03-1990. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42807