<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42801</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Petitioners in a case concerning the withdrawal of exemption granted for Active Erythromycin Thicyonate (TIOC) and compliance with natural justice principles before the Collector of Customs (Appeals). The court held that the demand for additional duty and penalty was premature and not legally sustainable due to lack of public knowledge of the withdrawal notification. Additionally, the court found that the Collector of Customs (Appeals) violated natural justice principles by not providing a hearing before ordering the deposit of the penalty. Consequently, the court set aside the orders of the Customs authorities in favor of the Petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:24:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42801</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Petitioners in a case concerning the withdrawal of exemption granted for Active Erythromycin Thicyonate (TIOC) and compliance with natural justice principles before the Collector of Customs (Appeals). The court held that the demand for additional duty and penalty was premature and not legally sustainable due to lack of public knowledge of the withdrawal notification. Additionally, the court found that the Collector of Customs (Appeals) violated natural justice principles by not providing a hearing before ordering the deposit of the penalty. Consequently, the court set aside the orders of the Customs authorities in favor of the Petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>