https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768598 CCI dismissed allegations against airport operator for abuse of dominant position under Section 4 of Competition Act. The Commission found no prima facie case regarding monopolistic environment creation, selective contract awarding, or market access denial. Evidence showed parking and lounge service contracts were awarded through competitive bidding processes with multiple participants, not to related entities as alleged. The 13% tender fee was uniform across all service providers and continuation of previous statutory charges. Information was closed under Section 26(2) with no relief granted under Section 33. en-us Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:32:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768598 CCI dismissed allegations against airport operator for abuse of dominant position under Section 4 of Competition Act. The Commission found no prima facie case regarding monopolistic environment creation, selective contract awarding, or market access denial. Evidence showed parking and lounge service contracts were awarded through competitive bidding processes with multiple participants, not to related entities as alleged. The 13% tender fee was uniform across all service providers and continuation of previous statutory charges. Information was closed under Section 26(2) with no relief granted under Section 33. Case-Laws Law of Competition Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768598