https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768598 Allegations of abuse of dominance under Section 4 were found insufficient at the prima facie stage because the challenged 13% fee was a uniform continuation of earlier airport charges, with no evidence of unfair discrimination, exorbitance, or speculative monopolistic effect. The parking and lounge contract awards were also not shown to involve selective favouritism, market foreclosure, or exclusionary conduct, as the material indicated competitive bidding and selection under the governing concession framework. The information was therefore closed at the prima facie stage, interim relief was declined, and confidentiality was granted for specified material for the stated period. en-us Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:32:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768598 Allegations of abuse of dominance under Section 4 were found insufficient at the prima facie stage because the challenged 13% fee was a uniform continuation of earlier airport charges, with no evidence of unfair discrimination, exorbitance, or speculative monopolistic effect. The parking and lounge contract awards were also not shown to involve selective favouritism, market foreclosure, or exclusionary conduct, as the material indicated competitive bidding and selection under the governing concession framework. The information was therefore closed at the prima facie stage, interim relief was declined, and confidentiality was granted for specified material for the stated period. Case-Laws Law of Competition Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768598