https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42796 The Court modified the impugned order by allowing the petitioner to furnish a personal bond for the entire penalty amount instead of a cash deposit. The petitioner was still required to deposit the duty amount for the appeal. The Court emphasized the importance of considering prima facie case on appeal and financial hardship in stay applications. The Court extended the time for payment, allowing the petitioner to pay in instalments or a lump sum. No costs were awarded, and the Court disposed of the writ petition accordingly. en-us Fri, 29 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:15:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42796 The Court modified the impugned order by allowing the petitioner to furnish a personal bond for the entire penalty amount instead of a cash deposit. The petitioner was still required to deposit the duty amount for the appeal. The Court emphasized the importance of considering prima facie case on appeal and financial hardship in stay applications. The Court extended the time for payment, allowing the petitioner to pay in instalments or a lump sum. No costs were awarded, and the Court disposed of the writ petition accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42796