<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 532 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768618</link>
    <description>ITAT Jaipur allowed the appeal regarding disallowance of interest expenses and depreciation on vehicles registered in directors&#039; names, following SC precedent in Poddar Cement that possession and business use establishes ownership rights. The tribunal deleted additions for interest on loans given, finding no direct nexus established, and disallowed notional income addition on building construction expenditure citing Rajasthan HC decision in Ram Kishan Verma. However, business promotion expenses disallowance was upheld due to cash payments and contrary facts. The 5% salary expenses disallowance was deleted as AO acted on assumptions without rejecting books of account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 13:20:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 532 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768618</link>
      <description>ITAT Jaipur allowed the appeal regarding disallowance of interest expenses and depreciation on vehicles registered in directors&#039; names, following SC precedent in Poddar Cement that possession and business use establishes ownership rights. The tribunal deleted additions for interest on loans given, finding no direct nexus established, and disallowed notional income addition on building construction expenditure citing Rajasthan HC decision in Ram Kishan Verma. However, business promotion expenses disallowance was upheld due to cash payments and contrary facts. The 5% salary expenses disallowance was deleted as AO acted on assumptions without rejecting books of account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>