<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 539 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768625</link>
    <description>ITAT Chandigarh quashed reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 where loose papers pertaining to third party were found during search. Tribunal held AO should have proceeded u/s 153C instead of 147/148 as documents were seized from searched person. AO failed to follow mandatory procedure requiring satisfaction from searched person&#039;s AO before transmitting matter. Addition of Rs.13 Cr undisclosed income deleted as AO lacked material evidence beyond statement of accountant against whom FIR was lodged. Assessment also quashed for non-issuance of notice u/s 143(2) which is prerequisite before scrutiny. Penalty u/s 271D deleted as underlying addition was removed and amount didn&#039;t constitute loan/deposit under Section 269SS.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 13:48:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 539 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768625</link>
      <description>ITAT Chandigarh quashed reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 where loose papers pertaining to third party were found during search. Tribunal held AO should have proceeded u/s 153C instead of 147/148 as documents were seized from searched person. AO failed to follow mandatory procedure requiring satisfaction from searched person&#039;s AO before transmitting matter. Addition of Rs.13 Cr undisclosed income deleted as AO lacked material evidence beyond statement of accountant against whom FIR was lodged. Assessment also quashed for non-issuance of notice u/s 143(2) which is prerequisite before scrutiny. Penalty u/s 271D deleted as underlying addition was removed and amount didn&#039;t constitute loan/deposit under Section 269SS.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>