<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42793</link>
    <description>A loan licensee who manufactures goods on its own account under its control and supervision, even in another factory, is treated as a manufacturer for excise purposes. The exemption notification&#039;s clubbing provisions for clearances from the same factory were upheld as valid conditions designed to preserve the exemption ceiling and were not found ultra vires the Act or Article 14. Genuine loan licensees in SSI factories may still claim the exemption, provided the notification&#039;s conditions, authorisation and excise formalities are satisfied. The denial orders were quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration on the correct legal basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:06:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42793</link>
      <description>A loan licensee who manufactures goods on its own account under its control and supervision, even in another factory, is treated as a manufacturer for excise purposes. The exemption notification&#039;s clubbing provisions for clearances from the same factory were upheld as valid conditions designed to preserve the exemption ceiling and were not found ultra vires the Act or Article 14. Genuine loan licensees in SSI factories may still claim the exemption, provided the notification&#039;s conditions, authorisation and excise formalities are satisfied. The denial orders were quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration on the correct legal basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>